False Grammatical Idol Melt-Down
If you're going to learn anything from my continuing adventures in grammatical standards, learn these two things! Take it away, Chicago Manual of Style:
Bonus Fun Fact #1: Actually, the Chicago Manual of Style's grammar section is a relatively new addition to that long-authoritative volume, and its presentation is apparently regarded somewhat less highly than similar material in other grammar handbooks. I just like quoting it because it's written in chapters and verses. Amen. (Okay, they don't really call them verses. I like to call them verses, though.)
Bonus Fun Fact #2: All grammar-related "Fun Facts" are, in fact, excruciatingly dull.
(Chapter 5, verse 169) The traditional caveat of yesteryear against ending sentences with prepositions is, for most writers, an unnecessary and pedantic restriction. . . . A sentence that ends in a preposition may sound more natural than a sentence carefully constructed to avoid a final preposition. . . . The 'rule' prohibiting terminal prepositions was an ill-founded superstition.Hear that? Everyone's high school English teacher owes us an apology.
(Chapter 5, verse 191) There is a widespread belief — one with no historical or grammatical foundation — that it is an error to begin a sentence with a conjunction such as and, but, or so. In fact, a substantial percentage (often as many as 10 percent) of the sentences in first-rate writing begin with conjunctions. It has been so for centuries, and even the most conservative grammarians have followed this practice.
Bonus Fun Fact #1: Actually, the Chicago Manual of Style's grammar section is a relatively new addition to that long-authoritative volume, and its presentation is apparently regarded somewhat less highly than similar material in other grammar handbooks. I just like quoting it because it's written in chapters and verses. Amen. (Okay, they don't really call them verses. I like to call them verses, though.)
Bonus Fun Fact #2: All grammar-related "Fun Facts" are, in fact, excruciatingly dull.
4 Comments:
Okay, "enjamb" isn't a word, and even if it were a word it wouldn't mean that. "Enjambment" refers to the treatment of sentences across lines of poetry.
Whatever your verbal grabagizing adds up to, it ain't poetry.
How is it you're happier to riff on all this than to describe Portland even a little bit?
I'm pretty sure that in standard practice staring sentences with prepositions carries a certain rhetorical heft, something that makes it distinct from simply a comma.
Yay open comments! lalalalalalalala
Portland? where's that?
wow, and this whole time I had been just assuming that the only people reading this blog were in the family.
Post a Comment
<< Home