Friday, March 11, 2011

Can't You See How Happy We Would Stochastically Be

Teas for Two

Picture me upon your knee
Just tea for two
And two for tea
Just me for you
And you for me alone

II.
Picture me for tea for two
And two for two
And you for tea
Just me upon your knee
Just me alone

III.
Picture me for two for tea for two
And you
And your knee
Just tea for your knee
Just me for your knee
Just me alone

IV.
Picture me for two
And you
And two for me alone

V.
Picture me upon you
And your knee
Just me upon your knee
Just tea
Just tea
Just tea
Just tea for tea for you for me upon you
And your knee
Just tea
Just me for tea
Just me upon you for me for me for two
And you
And your knee
Just me for tea for me alone

VI.
Picture me alone

Epilog

The first stanza there, as noted, comes from Irving Caesar's "Tea for Two" lyrics, albeit from the later, solo female rendering rather than the original No, No, Nanette duet. The other stanzas are similarly accepted by the epilog, and were culled from several dozen random walks through the graph, powered by a slapdash Ruby script and the fierce urgency of "I should be doing something else right now". Relatedly: Ella Fitzgerald, finite state machines.

1 Comments:

Blogger Pete said...

Increasing the volume of conceptual poetry on the blog, of course, helps alleviate the stress the best.

High five.

3/11/2011 10:10 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home